THE AMBOSELI COMMUNITY WILDLIFE TOURISM PROJECT |
|

"How can such abundance of wild animals exist on so dusty a plain?"wrote Joseph Thompson in 1885.
"Turn in whatever direction you please, they are to be seen in astonishing numbers."Indeed, great herds of buffalo, zebra, wildebeest and gazelles roamed the savannah in those bygone days. Lumbering rhinos lazed in the groves of yellow fever trees, while giraffes snipped at the young shoots. Lions would be heard roaring every night and cheetahs could be seen during the day chasing their luckless prey at breakneck speed. It was a veritable paradise for wildlife.
AmboseliAmboseli -- the very name conjures up a vista of elephants and Kilimanjaro -- is one of Kenya's main attractions. The name actually comes from the Maasai word 'embosel', a dry open area. Wildlife is still abundant in the national park and it is the best place in the world to see and photograph African elephants against a backdrop of the snow-capped mountain, Kilimanjaro. | ![]() |
![]() |
The Maasai people first came here about three hundred years ago, replacing other more primitive people. In those days the Maasai were nomadic pastoralists, relying entirely on their cattle sheep and goats for all their requirements. They moved between the best areas for grazing and there was plenty of land for everyone. They did not hunt the wildlife but learned to live with it quite peaceably with only the occasional fracas taking place, either in defence of their livestock, or to provide sport for the famed Maasai warriors, who would show off to their peers and girl friends by taking part in lion hunts with their six foot long spears and heavy buffalo-hide shields. But since the population has grown and cattle numbers have increased, pressures on the land have widened and there is less and less room for wildlife. |
This
situation has led to a severe deterioration of the vegetation which has suffered
from overgrazing and from the absence of wild herbivores that used to graze
and browse the whole mosaic of plants. As a result, the quality of the Maasai
livestock has deteriorated and become more susceptible to drought and disease
and the people themselves have become poverty-stricken and regularly have to
seek food aid during drought periods., says Jacob Leyian, Chairman of the Eselenkei Group Ranch."For too long we have been denied the benefit from the wildlife we have protected all these years"
"The government took our land to form Amboseli National Park and now they pocket all the money the tourists pay to enter. But much of the wildlife lives on our land outside the national park, grazing our grass, and sometimes killing our livestock. If we are to conserve the wildebeest and zebra that eat our grass we must have some financial benefit in return."
Another
leading Maasai elder Lengu Ole Mbaa who was once a clan chief argues,"During droughts our people starve, and children and old people die. We must make use of this resource given to us by God but we need to be shown how to do it. We are not traders by nature; we are cattle people and know nothing of tourists and tourism. But our people are willing to learn the skills required by tour operators and safari lodge managers, so that we can earn money from those who want to visit our land and photograph our wild animals."
Likewise,
the flora has suffered over the same period with equally disastrous results.
The decline in numbers of wild herbivores generally over the whole ecosystem
and the complete absence of some of the most important species - particularly
rhinos - has resulted in the proliferation of plants that the burgeoning numbers
of the replacement species, cattle, sheep and goats, do not eat.
The
Maasai are learning that cattle and goats actually need elephants and rhinos
to keep their pastures healthy. There is now a real threat of more decimation
to the remaining wild herds through the bush meat trade, which, if allowed to
continue unchecked, will reduce the numbers of wildlife to a point where even
the remaining species will be unable to regenerate. The encroachment of subsistence
farming is also threatening to render some of the most important wildlife habitats
useless. Based on our knowledge gained over many years and our close association
both with the communities and with the wildlife of the area, we are convinced
that the isolated islands of conservation, notably the Amboseli National Park
and the three existing community wildlife sanctuaries will not be sufficient
to save the ecosystem.
For
the first time the herdsmen can make the link between the wildebeest and zebra
grazing his land, and a fuller stomach or more education for his children. All
illegal killing of wildlife within these three areas has stopped and if any
snares set by the bush meat traders are found they are destroyed immediately.
But many more areas must be set aside before the ecosystem can safely be regarded
as secure."Unless more areas are set aside very soon, and the animals within them preserved, this 6,000 square kilometre ecosystem, one of the most important in Kenya, will not survive. If the wildlife cannot move freely between each 'island' of conservation, none of them will remain.
In order to facilitate more areas, the ACWTP have applied to several organisations for funds to move the idea forward.
Animals which are used to moving long distances between grazing grounds cannot suddenly change their habits so if we cannot join up some of the islands to make migration corridors, the wildlife will not survive and we shall lose this great resource which could be our very lifeblood in future years."
|
|
The Maasai are
a very fragmented people living in isolated pockets. The community in one
area may not know what is happening in another part of their land and families
who have yet to declare a wildlife sanctuary may not know that their cousins
just a few kilometres away are already earning money from theirs. A 25-minute
video film will therefore be produced in the Maasai language showing clearly
the benefits that can accrue from allowing wildlife tourism on their land.
This film will form part of a presentation that ACWTP will take round to village
centres. The local community will be invited to share in the discussions about
the new concept for reducing their poverty through wildlife conservation and
tourism on their land.
Facilitation
of Areas to be set aside for Tourism
One
of the reasons that ACWTP have found it difficult to secure more areas for
wildlife tourism is that the landowners expect to receive payment for the
area directly they have passed the resolution to set them aside. The motivation
is limited unless they can see an immediate return from their decision. But
it may take up to a year after the decision has been taken, before income
begins to accrue. The community must gain benefit from it while investors
are being sought and negotiations entered into and completed.
In
order to give an inducement for the landowners to approve of wildlife tourism
in their areas, and in order to give an incentive to reputable investors to
develop the areas, the provision of two permanent water supplies will be made
available to each community that agrees to set aside a wildlife tourism sanctuary:
one for the community and one for the wildlife tourism development. This combination
means that the immediate practical needs of the herders are being met, whilst
at the same time enabling the introduction of the wildlife tourist development.
Employment
is the one means of gaining income directly to those members of the community
who have no access to other income from rentals and visitor fees. Similarly,
the project's objective is to support and enable the communities to manage
wildlife tourism alongside pastoral activities. A small college will be set
up in Loitokitok, the main centre for the area, for the practical training
of skills in hotel and guiding work so that as many local people as possible
will be qualified to apply for work in the tourist developments. There will
also be representative training in more specialised techniques, including
negotiation skills, estate management, book-keeping and borehole maintenance
in order that the landowners may understand that they have responsibility
to manage their areas in accordance with good accountability and transparency.
|
|
Further reading and links: |
![]() |